“It is precluded by the nature of the term constitution which was the FOUNDATION of the Union and could only be changed by the amendment process.”
The Constitution is not a suicide pact. By your logic, if a constitutional amendment to make, say, Louisiana a toxic waste dump was introduced, and 40 states ratified it, Louisiana would just have to grin and bear it, and would not have the right to withdraw from the Union. I call bullshit. Seems to me that you are confusing the United States with the former Soviet Union.
The constitution is the supreme law of the land. You can play “what if” all you want but it won’t change that fact.\
Any human institution can become fallible that is why the means of changing it is included in the instrument.
When setting up an analogy aren't you supposed to use a hypothetical argument?