Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mind-numbed Robot

I’d say you are more correct than the south-north kneejerk reactions.


125 posted on 08/05/2010 8:28:35 AM PDT by beckysueb (January 20, 2013. When Obama becomes just a skidmark on the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: beckysueb

Thank you, Becky Sue. The fact that there are honest differences over this 149 years later indicates it was not a cut and dried situation. Part of that is due to the way history has been presented through the years. I am sure there has been objective work done on the subject, using original documents as sources, but I don’t see any of that scholarship exhibited here.

I had two semesters of History of the South under Grady McWhiney at Millsaps College in Jackson, MS. One of his colleagues was T. Harry Williams, at Louisiana State University. They were two of the best.

As I remember Dr. McWhiney put the flash point on the tariff and Ft. Sumpter was a tariff collection point. Slavery was the issue with emotional appeal and was stressed by the North to arouse people against the South and that version has survived through history for that reason.


201 posted on 08/05/2010 11:25:55 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson