To: backwoods-engineer
"Earth is the ONLY planet of its kind in the galaxy, or even the Local Group, or maybe in the entire universe." I'm sorry, that's a hard one to swallow. The galaxy is a very big place (100 billion stars), and it is less than a spec of sand in the Sahara compared to the known universe. The only reason we aren't finding more earthlike planets is because we don't have the technology to see them yet.
25 posted on
07/26/2010 6:30:59 PM PDT by
gore_sux
(Al Franken - Preferred by Minnesota Educated Somali Pirates and Suicide Bombers Everywhere)
To: gore_sux
"Earth is the ONLY planet of its kind in the galaxy, or even the Local Group, or maybe in the entire universe." I'm sorry, that's a hard one to swallow. The galaxy is a very big place (100 billion stars), and it is less than a spec of sand in the Sahara compared to the known universe. The only reason we aren't finding more earthlike planets is because we don't have the technology to see them yet. Yes, there are many stars in our galaxy, but more than 99% of them are the wrong TYPE, or in the wrong PLACE, or of the wrong SIZE. Read "The Privileged Planet" by Guillermo Gonzalez. Remember, we are talking about "habitable" planets, not some piece of crap moon, tidally locked to its little red flare star, where a small colony of bacteria huddles in a little pond in the weak sunlight.
28 posted on
07/26/2010 6:38:29 PM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(There is no "common good" which minimizes or sacrifices the individual. --Walter Scott Hudson)
To: gore_sux; backwoods-engineer; KevinDavis

Click on the picture, and read the information on all the sections inside. This is one of the most awe-inspiring charts I've ever seen.
To: gore_sux
“and it is less than a spec of sand in the Sahara compared to the known universe”
You get the Captain Hyperbole award for that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson