To: driftdiver; PugetSoundSoldier; antiRepublicrat; SmokingJoe
This one is really interesting.
Who will be the first to claim Secunia is biased?
3 posted on
07/22/2010 7:42:26 AM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: for-q-clinton
Can you point to a web site that will take over my Mac simply by visiting it as you claimed?
This is the fifth or sixth time I have asked for a verification.
Put up or shut up time : )
At this point I can only conclude that you are completely dishonest.
8 posted on
07/22/2010 7:46:52 AM PDT by
LeGrande
(Yes, I am an agent of Satan, but my duties are largely ceremonial.)
To: for-q-clinton
LOL The defense will now be "Who wants to make viruses or hack a system that is used in only ten percent of the PC's? We don't have anything to worry about."
Of course, when Windows users used that same argument as to why they were attacking Windows they scoffed.
19 posted on
07/22/2010 7:58:13 AM PDT by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: for-q-clinton
Secunia isn’t biased in the way that, say, Rob Enderle is seriously biased against Linux. The problem with Secunia is not so much them, but the misinterpretation of the raw numbers that don’t necessarily have a correlation to real-world security.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson