I did not suggest apple didn’t patch the exploited vulnerabilities. I claimed they didn’t patch all the vulnerabilities that Charlie Miller has known about for quite a while. And that they knew he was going to attack OS X with one of those exploits he had at his dispossal.
You: "But what you are ignoring is that these exploits have been known for a long time and yet Apple has not fixed them. "
False. Apple fixed every one of the exploits, as shown. When first caught on your false claim you said you were talking about a different contest, but now we know we're talking about the same contest. Pick which defense you want to use and stick with it.
I claimed they didn’t patch all the vulnerabilities that Charlie Miller has known about for quite a while.
That is a null-meaning sentence. Nobody can know what vulnerabilites he knows about but hasn't disclosed, if any. And if he hasn't disclosed them, then of course Apple wouldn't have patched them, not knowing they exist in the first place.
So far you have refused to back up your claim that Miller disclosed vulnerabilities to Apple, which Apple has refused to fix.