Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato; Big_Harry; Senior Chief

I seem to remember the word “lawful” being in that oath. As in obeying lawful orders.


17 posted on 07/20/2010 2:43:49 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: NTHockey

If the military or the law enforcement community launch an assault against the civilian population, (not the traffic stop tasering of old women that seems to be the rage now a days), then the oath that I took on August 10, 1966 which has not been renounced in any form or fashion, allows me to use whatever means necessary to protect the Constitution. I sincerely hope the grievances that we have against the government will be resolved peacefully, and to a happy conclusion, but now is the time to firmly rehearse in your mind just what actions you will take if and when the worst case comes on us.


23 posted on 07/20/2010 3:19:24 PM PDT by Big_Harry ( Starve the Beast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: NTHockey
I seem to remember the word “lawful” being in that oath. As in obeying lawful orders.

It's not there, but it is understood. I once briefed that very subject, as the most junior officer in my Air Guard E&I squadron.

43 posted on 07/20/2010 5:23:30 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: NTHockey

I think it’s still unsettled as to whether any orders are now lawful now. At least it’s not clear to me.


50 posted on 07/20/2010 6:23:59 PM PDT by ducdriver (judica me, Deus, et discerne causam meam de gente non sancta. (Ps. 42))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson