Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ MacWoW

Right. She’s all ticked-off over the paltry 10K per month and willing to defame in releasing private, surreptitious tapes for the purpose of extortion. Gibson has a good chance of counter-suing for damages and if nothing else having her honor the visitation agreement. He will claim the drunken ramblings were a sign of emotional distress caused by her not honoring visitation rights which will strengthen his suit against her.

She’s probably not going to get more money out of all this and will have to pay her attorney fees from her 10K monthly. She is also possibly facing criminal charges for unlawful recordings and violation of a prior restraining order against releasing the tapes.

Heck, she’ll really be poor paying all her attorneys fees and may even agree to relinquish custody in a buy out. She’s a hooker so the money is her goal. She over-played her hand. She’ll take the buyout.


230 posted on 07/12/2010 8:59:27 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]


To: Justa
She’s a hooker so the money is her goal. She over-played her hand. She’ll take the buyout.

Well she does have Timothy Daltons son to care for too. I think he's about 10. However she has overplayed it. Articles claim the judge is annoyed with her attorney for leaving out information when they got a restraining order against Gibson. And it's the same judge that told her to zip it.

232 posted on 07/12/2010 9:04:41 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson