[Kleon]

Why? For one simple reason — why would you spend $2 Million or so on legal fees to avoid showing a birth certificate???

I don't know why you would. Obama didn't. That rumor was debunked already.

[Menehune56]

why would you spend $2 Million or so on legal fees to avoid showing a birth certificate???
I don't know why you would. Obama didn't. That rumor was debunked already.

Do you have a citation for this debunking?

[Jackson Brown]

Why? For one simple reason — why would you spend $2 Million or so on legal fees to avoid showing a birth certificate???

=========================

I don't know why you would. Obama didn't. That rumor was debunked already.

BS! I've seen FAR too many reports of legal filings — in regular newspapers and from AP — FROM Obama’s lawyers over the last three years to tell be it was “debunked”. Maybe the amount is in question, but the fact he fought it in the courts is NOT under contention...that takes lawyers and lawyers cost money.

EVEN if the lawyers gave him their time and effort gratis -- why fight showing one's birth certificate...period.

Show me the link to where it was debunked!

[Red Steel]

I don't know why you would. Obama didn't. That rumor was debunked already.

It has not been 'debunk already'. Maybe in the puny minds of after-Birthers.

We know for a fact that the law firm Perkins & Coie was paid by the Obama campaign about 1.7 million dollars up to the summer of 2009 for services rendered.

The services rendered includes defending Obama in his eligibility suits.

We also know that Obama hired the After-Birther lawyer Robert Bauer from Perkins and Coie as his White House counsel.

Obama law tab up to $1.7 million 'Grass-roots army' contributions used to crush eligibility lawsuits?