Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LorenC

Nothing is ‘patently ridiculous’ when it comes to Obama at spending money, especially other people’s money that he didn’t earn. We all see that it is a fact that the Obama campaign has paid Perkins & Coie millions of dollars. Barack Obama does not care that he crazily over-payed for services to defend his presidency even if it was 10 grand per page. Obama loves to spend. You only have to watch him spend and plan to spend tax payer’s money at rates not ever seen before.


114 posted on 07/11/2010 12:48:08 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel; Kleon; wintertime
It turns out that my figure of 10 cases was WAY too generous. According to this case index, only three cases had Obama-paid defense teams. The aforementioned Berg and Hollister, and also Keyes v. Bowen.

A fourth case (the seriously racist case The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri et al v. Obama et al) was sealed, and so Plaintiff's counsel is unknown. But let's go ahead and assume it WAS Perkins Coie. Every other case is specifically noted as NOT having Obama-paid counsel.

However, the counsel in Keyes v. Bowen was NOT from Perkins Coie. The attorney was from the California firm Strumwasser & Woocher. So anything he charged wouldn't be included in any payments to Perkins Coie. (And, in fact, he worked pro bono.)

So that's just three cases with Perkins Coie attorneys. At most. If, just to be generous, we go ahead and assume the existence of an unknown case where Obama paid for his own defense, that's a total of four cases.

Thus, the average expense per case becomes a whopping $500,000.00 per case.

117 posted on 07/11/2010 2:00:13 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson