Yes that works, but it is still very difficult to read, and in no way a “time line.” For instance, on the “time line,” 1976 appears before 1969. Now, I am as open to new ways of doing things as anyone else, but time, in this context, can’t be marching backward. This appears to have been designed by someone who is very cleaver about website setup but who has no grasp of history. Time is a construct, I know, but this is pushing it. Sorry.
You are seeing something that has never been seen before.
on the “time line,” 1976 appears before 1969.
Could you tell me which time-line that happened on.
You know, it isn't perfect. And it has only been up for an hour or so.