Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

The more I think about this the more I’d like to know just what they found. Was it truly multicellular organisms or was it really colonies of unicellular life? This sure changes the traditional timeline.


59 posted on 07/08/2010 12:51:11 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
Somewhere I had something else, memory's too hazy, but anyway, meanwhile:
Rocks show life began 1bn years earlier than first thought
The Guardian
Saturday August 14, 1999
[orig: www.newsunlimited.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,73745,00.html]
Scientists studying Australian rocks have found evidence that primitive forms of life existed 2.7bn years ago - a billion years earlier than had been previously shown... The finding pushes back evidence of life to the Archean era, the period from the beginning of earth to about 2.5bn years ago... Most rocks as old as the ones studied have undergone a process called metamorphism, an intense geological heating that changes them and which scientists believed would destroy any organic compounds they contained. But the shales studied by this team were well-preserved and still contained the biological chemicals. The researchers found evidence of organic compounds called lipids in the sedimentary rocks located more than 2,100ft deep in north-western Australia's Roy Hill Shale and Marra Mamba Formations. The rocks formed a seabed 2.6 bn to 2.7 bn years ago... Because of their complexity, eukaryotes were thought to have developed relatively late in earth's history. This discovery pushes the date for their appearance back to the earliest part of geological time.
Early life theory takes a biff
May 24, 2002
Moreover, the carbon isotopic basis used for interpreting its organic origin is questionable, the authors say. The authors demonstrate that much of the fine layering in the banded rocks, interpreted as a typical BIF (Banded Iron Formation) sedimentary structure, was in fact formed as a result of metamorphic processes.

A chemical study of the rocks also points away from a BIF origin for the banded rock. Analyses of green bands show that their composition is very similar to komatiite, a type of basalt. If this is correct there is little chance that the preserved graphite represents past life.

Recent studies of hydrothermal vents on mid-ocean ridges have also shown that basalt-like rocks can interact with water to form carbon compounds by non-biological processes, leaving an isotopic signature similar to that of metabolic function. While it is possible life existed on Earth when the rocks on Akilia formed, direct evidence for life older than approximately 3.8 billion years ago is still lacking.

62 posted on 07/08/2010 5:00:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2095263/posts


63 posted on 07/08/2010 5:02:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2059790/posts


64 posted on 07/08/2010 5:05:05 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson