Posted on 07/03/2010 5:16:46 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
I’ll see you one Grierson and raise you one Hampton...
Excuse me but me thinks at Fredericksburg, it was the other way around - the yanks got clobbered there...
hmmm, the product of yankee schooling, are we?
Which is why I said that Lee had watched Burnside slaughter his troops on Marye's Heights. You may need to work on your reading comprehension.
Sorry, yank - I read it thrice to make sure - you need to go to a non-govt school and learn to write right...or, you need to be consistent in your sentence meanings...
Only in Texas does one still find such love of regional American soil now—there and on autumn Saturdays at college football games.
The SEC and most of the ACC fans have a lot spiritually in common with the old patriots who fought and died for their states during the 2nd American War For Independence (say something ugly about the Volunteers or the Tigers to a man in orange and see what happens) Slavery was a sideshow to a sideshow for those honorable men.
I'm betting it's one of those Southern school systems that's at fault.
I’d never read that account, by the way, so thanks. Just finished reading it. A few relatives mentioned, and quite a few more whose families I know.
Busy day? :)
You guys are right about Grant and Vicksburg but I think Gettysburg has rightfully received more historical attention. First, and obviously, because Lincoln appeared there and delivered his immortal “address.” Second, it was the first - and last - time confederate forces invaded Union territory. And, the 51,000+ deaths there shocked and appalled even those who knew we were in a very bloody conflict. Also, to this very day Civil War buffs try to re-enact the battle with much media hype.
Thanks for the info.
You’re a real Civil War buff! I’m not and don’t pretend to have any experise with respect to details. However, I’d recommend to you and all others a 3 volume work by Shelby Foote which is, in the opinion of many experts, a classic. I admit I was a little intimidated at first by the prospect of THREE VOLUMES! However, Foote has such a marvelous and readable style that he has the rare historian’s talent of being able to make the complex and particular understandable without oversimplifying. I spent many happy hours reading, at my leisure, his great work. It’s also the kind of study you can pick up and resume reading without a sense of lost continuity. If you havn’t read it, I highly recommend it.
Winik, whose book I cited, claims that the real heroes at Appomatix were Grant and Lee. Grant’s terms of surrender respected the dignity and heroism of the confederate troops. He allowed them to retain their small arms, etc., which were part of southern culture. Lee, for his part, insisted in making the confederates realize war was REALLY OVER. This seems obvious to us in historical retrospoect. BUT, as Winik documents in detail, the South was prepared to continue a guerilla warfare against the North. This could have gone on for years and greatly damaged the destiny of American history. Nor were the “guerilla war” advocates isolated. Prominent men like Jefferson Davis (and many veterans) were prepared to fight to the bitter end. It was, however, thanks to the civility and humanity of Lee and Grant, that this didn’t happen. Perhaps this is why Winston Churchill referred to our Civil War as the last war fought “between gentlemen.”
Good point! I think if we fail to preserve our democratic republic at the ballot box we face a new and different type of violent internal strife. I don’t have the time or space to enumerate the dangers, but as a FReeper you probably know already know them. As a late U.S. Supreme Court justice said, “Every day I wake up, I find it more difficult to recognize my own country.”
While our family motto is “Go NAVY, Beat Army”, I’d have to say that the USMA should be considered non-denominational...!
Happy Fourth...
‘The South could have easily won the war. The only thing necessary was to end the norths will to fight, just like Vietnam.’
You are correct. As late as the end of summer, 1864, Lincoln expected to lose the presidential election. Had McClellan been elected he would have ended the war and let the South go. It might be thought that since he wouldn’t have taken office until March, 1865 it would have been too late for the Confederacy, but if he had been elected, the fighting of late 1864 and early 1865 is unlikely to have occurred against his will.
After Sherman took Chattanooga and Atlanta and started his march to Savannah the northern population could see victory, and turned to the party of Lincoln and the Northern victory.
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks mainepatsfan."It was all my fault." -- Robert E. LeeJust adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution. |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · Archaeology · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.