Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

Even with a Lee victory at Gettysburg, would he have been able to exploit the victory there into victory for the Confederacy?

I think the argument that Vicksburg was the more strategically important of the two July 1863 Union victories is pretty compelling.


24 posted on 07/02/2010 7:10:42 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: dmz
The problem with Vicksburg is that everyone knew the "real" war was in the East. That's why Grant got so little consideration for the top spot as general of the army. Ultimately, it came down to either seizing Richmond, or allowing D.C. to fall.

Gingrich and Forstchen, in their "Gettysburg" series, where Lee wins a decisive victory at Gettysburg, go on to paint a scenario where he fails (barely) to capture D.C., then Grant, with men from the West and the remainder of the Army of the Potomac, trap Lee between forces from Washington and the Union Army to the north. Quite plausible.

25 posted on 07/02/2010 7:34:37 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson