Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver

You might not like to use them as an example, so what. That doesn’t mitigate the facts. They used this method and it worked for them.


8 posted on 06/26/2010 4:15:11 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Former Proud Canadian

“You might not like to use them as an example”

For good reason.

“That doesn’t mitigate the facts. They used this method and it worked for them.”

So they sealed a well that was 5000 feet under water and had between 7000 and 10000 PSI of pressure coming up. All in a currently unstable seafloor?


20 posted on 06/26/2010 4:31:49 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Do you show me any kind of follow up on these wells after they were nuked, say 20 yrs later, as to whether or not it was a 100% seal or simply not leaking as much?


95 posted on 06/26/2010 6:52:17 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson