Don’t know about this story.
Lots of bad info in it.
Loma Prieta is nowhere near southern california, Its north of Santa Cruz.
I was just googling Loma Prieta for location, thanks
It’s not the facts, it what it says.
Isn’t that what Dan Rather said?
Nothing about this in the local Coachella Valley news, and we are upstream from Calexico. If the city moved over 2 feet south, then part of it would be in Mexico now!!!
Poorly written, not wrong. It’s the San Andreas fault which the author descripes as being in southern California. Loma Prieta is just north of center, near the northern limit of San Andreas’ intersection with California.
That's always been a crapshoot, depending whether you consider California as having 2 parts or 3. If only two, the dividing line seems extremely flexible, politically as well as physically. Personally I think California has at least four distinctly different parts going from South to North and three East to West.
A more intresting question, from the surveying perspective is : Do all legal property lines need to be redefined for thousands of properties both large and small?