To: bert; decimon; Hegewisch Dupa; maine-iac7; marron; mjp; razorback-bert; stefanbatory; wildbill; ...
Sorry for the intrusion, but I figured all those who posted in this topic will want to see this update:
|
While the results of Ramsey's research may present a compelling reason to revise records for the two millennia when Egypt dominated the Mediterranean world, Hawass remains categorical in his rejection of the technique: "Not even in five thousand years could carbon dating help archeology. We can use other kinds of methods like geoarcheology, which is very important, or DNA, or laser scanning, but carbon dating is useless. This science will never develop. In archeology, we consider carbon dating results imaginary." |
radiocarbon egypt site:freerepublic.com
Google
31 posted on
07/12/2010 6:03:48 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: SunkenCiv
32 posted on
07/12/2010 6:14:16 PM PDT by
Gertie
To: SunkenCiv
Imagine there’s no carbon dating,
it’s easy if you try.
Should we go by the posting date of this thread or does it need a carbon job?
33 posted on
07/12/2010 6:17:11 PM PDT by
decimon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson