To: SampleMan
Part of the problem with solar power is that only 1/3 of the cost is solar cells, the other 2/3 is installation and other electronic and electric parts, so even if the cost of solar cells goes to zero you’re still paying 2/3 of the cost.
And of course you still have the minor problem of “night”.
10 posted on
06/11/2010 4:44:14 PM PDT by
aquila48
To: aquila48
Part of the problem with solar power is that only 1/3 of the cost is solar cells, the other 2/3 is installation and other electronic and electric parts, so even if the cost of solar cells goes to zero youre still paying 2/3 of the cost. Are there power generation methods that do not require installation and other electrical components???? Miles of heavy gauge copper wire, transformers, and poles ain't cheap.
14 posted on
06/11/2010 4:47:44 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(No one should die on a gov. waiting list., or go broke because the gov. has dictated their salary.)
To: aquila48
Part of the problem with solar power is that only 1/3 of the cost is solar cells, the other 2/3 is installation and other electronic and electric parts, so even if the cost of solar cells goes to zero youre still paying 2/3 of the cost. From the article: The point is that while these cells are merely as efficient as very good photovoltaic panels, they use only about a hundredth of the material. Also the new design is highly flexible: built on a bed of silicon, Atwaters micrwire arrays can simply be peeled off and stuck pretty much wherever you want. They could even be integrated into buildings, as components that match the shape of roof tiles, says Atwater.
18 posted on
06/11/2010 4:56:05 PM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson