To: Mr Rogers
Except America doesnt recognize paternal citizenship as a binding obligation... But the British Nationality Act of 1948 that governed the status of Obama Sr’s children did at the time, therefore Obama was British 1st and American 2nd.
92 posted on
05/14/2010 8:13:16 PM PDT by
patlin
(1st SCOTUS of USA: "Human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.")
To: patlin
But the British Nationality Act of 1948 that governed the status of Obama Srs children did at the time, therefore Obama was British 1st and American 2nd. Maybe to the British, but in terms U.S. law, that doesn't matter at all.
96 posted on
05/14/2010 9:11:09 PM PDT by
Kleon
To: patlin
But the British Nationality Act of 1948 that governed the status of Obama Srs children did at the time, therefore Obama was British 1st and American 2nd. If Venezuelan law was changed to recognize everyone born on US soil as a Venezuelan citizen as well, would that eliminate everyone from NBC status?
What another nation claims is immaterial over what the US claims. We do not recognize another nation's claim on our citizens. If we do, then we open ourselves to claims such as the hypothetical Venezuelan situation.
120 posted on
05/14/2010 11:31:13 PM PDT by
PugetSoundSoldier
(Indignation over the Sting of Truth is the defense of the indefensible)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson