[BP2]

> Also, Vattel didn’t include the translation “natural born citizen”
> until AFTER the Constitution was written.

Well then, feel free to use Blackstone to define
Obama's status as the son of a British subject:

- OR -

If you wish, use Dicey's “Conflict of Laws”,
a chief citation used by Justice Gray in Wong Kim Ark v. U.S. (1898):

"A child whose father's father (paternal grandfather) was born within the British dominions is a natural-born British subject, even though the child's father and the child himself were not born within the British dominions." (Hint: This would DIRECTLY IMPACT Barack Hussein Obama and his lineage to his British father as a British subject, regardless of Obama Jr's birthplace).

Pick your poison ... carefully.

[Mr Rogers]

Except America doesn’t recognize paternal citizenship as a binding obligation...