The focus should be on his natural born citizen status..not the birth certificate or the social security number.
It does not matter if he was born in Hawaii or not. He is not a natural born or a native born citizen.
Judge Bouvier was admitted to practice law in Pennsylvania in 1818. This gets him pretty darn close to the Founders.
Google is blocking full view of this Law Dictionary, I purchased it a few weeks ago for a dollar.
Well, since you pinged me:
Here is a online version. I don’t feel like reading the whole thing, but at N, under “Natives”, you find:
http://www.constitution.org/bouv/bouviern.txt
” 4.-2. Persons born within the United States, since the Revolution, may be classed into those who are citizens, and those who are not.
5.-1st. Natives who are citizens are the children of citizens, and of aliens who at the time of their birth were residing within the United States.
6. The act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization, approved April 14, 1802, Sec. 4, provides that the children of persons who now are, or have been citizens of the United States, shall, though born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, be considered as citizens of the United States” But, the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never resided in the United States.
7.-2d. Natives who are not citizens are, first, the children of ambassadors, or other foreign ministers, who, although born here, are subjects or citizens of the government of their respective fathers.
Secondly, Indians, in general, are not citizens. Thirdly, negroes, or descendants of the African race, in general, have no power to vote, and are not eligible to office. “
This pretty well tracks with the majoritarian view of the Wong Kim Ark court in 1898 , and the Ankeny court in 2009.
parsy