Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
A natural born subject of Great Britain.can be a citizen of another country. Can a natural born citizen of the US be a citizen in another country? Photobucket The law-dictionary, explaining the rise, progress, and present ..., Volume 1 By Sir Thomas Edlyne Tomlins, Thomas Colpitts Granger
547 posted on 05/17/2010 2:48:28 PM PDT by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]


To: bushpilot1

“Can a natural born citizen of the US be a citizen in another country?”

More precisely, can a natural born citizen claim citizenship offered by another country? Yes, but upon claiming that citizenship as an adult, he loses his US citizenship.

Russia could declare that everyone born in Minnesota between 1955 and 1965 was a Russian citizen. That would make me eligible to claim Russian citizenship, but it would NOT make me one for the purposes of being eligible for office.

Had Obama ever made an attempt to claim citizenship in the UK or Kenya, I would agree that would cost him his US citizenship - certainly as far as being able to run for the Presidency.


550 posted on 05/17/2010 3:14:04 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]

To: bushpilot1
Can a natural born citizen of the US be a citizen in another country?

Yes, as long as both her parents were US citizens, she would be "born in the country, of parents who are citizens".

590 posted on 05/17/2010 7:26:39 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]

To: bushpilot1
A natural born subject of Great Britain.can be a citizen of another country. Can a natural born citizen of the US be a citizen in another country? You miss the point. Since the NBC phrase has never been clarified by amendment or SCOTUS decision, it reverts to what the Founders meant.

A good example of this is District of Columbia v. Heller, which hinged on the meaning of "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." in the 2nd Amendment. So, the NBC phrase needs to be interpreted in light of what the Founders understood it to mean. At the time, a British natural-born subject held one allegiance and one allegiance only to a single sovreign - and he could never forswear that allegiance.

If [in the rarest of circumstances] he DID hold more than one allegiance [but was born in England] - he was a Denizen. A Denizen held almost all of the rights of a natural-born subject, except that of holding high office.

Same would have applied in the United States - citizen, but NOT natural-born [in the 1700's].

601 posted on 05/17/2010 9:11:41 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson