Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2

No sense in discussing what Dicey meant. It’s not relevant to this discussion. YOU figure out why. Two reasons, at least. Easy ones.

parsy


496 posted on 05/17/2010 1:06:28 AM PDT by parsifal (I will be sent to an area where people are demanding free speech and I will not like it there. Orly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 495 | View Replies ]


To: parsifal; All

> No sense in discussing what Dicey meant. It’s not relevant to this discussion.

You said MONTHS ago that you've read Wong Kim Ark v. US, and then you proved that you had NOT.

Have you gotten around to it yet? Because yeah ... it is VERY “relevant to this discussion”.

499 posted on 05/17/2010 1:14:12 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson