[BP2]

> You see the real problem here is,
> one doesn’t use LEGAL DICTIONARIES to TRUMP CASE LAW.

LOL. Swing and strike.

[parsifal]

Look up there by the number 10. See the stuff that reads “District of Columbia v. Heller”-—that’s a legal case. The judges may use dictionaries, ALRs, AmJurs, treatises, and other stuff. Those are not the LAW, and they don’t trump cases.

In Heller, it isn’t the DICTIONARY, as LAW, that makes the decision. It’s the Court. Because DICTIONARIES ain’t law. If you doubt that, read thru the LEGAL DICTIONARY and look at the thousands of things there that ARE NOT law. Ducking stools might be in there. Wergild (sp) perhaps, too.

parsy, who wishes you would just learn to listen once in a while.

[Red Steel]

Indiana Supreme Court had no problem with that holding. So, yes, the issue was heard and ruled on as a matter of law and the case was dismissed—in part, because Obama is an NBC.

Wrong and wrong.

First, that's a false assumption. The state supreme court most likely didn't want to embarrass the Indiana appeals court because their opinion isn't worth dog poop. For what ever reasons they did not review it - you don't know and are jumping to conclusions. Second, the Indiana Court contradicts itself by stating Wong Kim Ark was not found to be a natural born citizen and then they cherry pick Blackstone using his natural born SUBJECT commentary as being the same as a natural born citizen that has the same meaning as the US Constitution NBC clause. Tsk Tsk...so much BS in the Indiana opinion, it is all bull-crap. It will never hold up to any scrutiny.

BP2 to Parsnips: LOL. Swing and strike.

Parsy it was game over for you awhile ago. You're still here - you lied.