Replies

BS! Your still ignoring the fact that the 14th did not merely exclude children born to dignitaries, it included children of ALL foreigners. The census data reported of 1892 which include all cunsus data from 1790-1890 back this up. You also ignore the part of the case which states:

unless his case is varied by some treaty stipulation.

WKA was subject to the treaty between the US & China. Under the Chinese Exclusion Act, which upheld Chinese Law, the Chinese immigrants and their children, could not legally become US citizens by accord of the treaty.

WKA fails no matter what twist you try to take. And also the fact that you try to change the subject by bringing in laws pertaining treason and you use such limited/edited definitions from a modern dictionary, not definitions that wee used at the time of the adoption of the constitution, again shows your desperation to somehow make dual citizenship a law, when in fact it is not according to the current US State Dept. They say it is accepted, but they do not condone the practice of it. Accepted by looking the other way does not make it Law of the Land!