Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

Does this mean that neanderthal and homo sapiens had a common ancestor or does it mean they came from two distinct lines and then bred together 30,000 years ago?
I didn’t think you could breed together and have offspring unless you had a common ancestor to begin with and were very genetically similar.


51 posted on 05/07/2010 12:51:36 PM PDT by Jessarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Jessarah
Both!

We had a common ancestor, we diverged into two distinct populations, and these two lines combined in a limited fashion by crossbreeds sometime prior to 30,000 years ago when the Neanderthal died out.

Yes, usually fertility between two different species is dependent upon a recent common ancestor, which implies/demands a certain level of genetic similarity. The big barrier to fertile cross breeds is when there is a different number of chromosomes in the parents. Not impossible to overcome, but it does increase infertility.

Similarly, Wolves and Coyotes share a recent common ancestor, AND they came from two distinct lines that have bred together years ago. Coyotes and Wolves developed into two distinct species, but two species that can and DO produce fertile offspring. One can, through DNA analysis, estimate the amount of Wolf ancestry in your average Coyote population - which will show how prevalent these crossbreedings were (or are).

54 posted on 05/07/2010 1:01:09 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Jessarah

So, then what’s 0bama’s excuse?


80 posted on 05/07/2010 5:30:45 PM PDT by Frenchtown Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson