Skip to comments.
Jerome R. Corsi : '2nd face' on Shroud points to supernatural origin
Catholic Online ^
| April 28 2010
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 05/01/2010 7:28:47 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-165 last
To: RegulatorCountry
I do not need relics either. I did not need the Shroud of Turin to become saved nor do I need it to stay saved. The LORD has used it in my life to further my faith in Him. I am intellectually and logically convinced that it is His burial shroud and that it does have a story to tell to the world and that story perfectly lines up with Sacred Scripture.
The Bible speaks of stirring your faith up. Faith can be strengthened and encouraged. It is not something that remains the same but increases. For those who have come to the logical conclusion that this is the very shroud that Christ was buried in it is a witness to the truth of His resurrection which is wonderful and I am sure meant to be so by The LORD. It is by no means the reason I believe but it does substantiate my belief as The LORD does everyday by a myriad of means.
161
posted on
05/03/2010 4:53:04 PM PDT
by
Bellflower
(If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
To: RightOnline
Yes! I have lost count of the smug nitwits who have dismissed the mountain of scientific data about the Shroud, on the grounds of the 1988 carbon test—and the letter from the French bishop in the fifteenth century—the one who claimed to know the guy who painted the Shroud.
Like bishops in the fifteenth century didn’t lie like bishops nowadays.
162
posted on
05/03/2010 8:46:57 PM PDT
by
Arthur McGowan
(In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
To: RightOnline
No way theres a second face, folks. Actually, Right, there is. It is very faint. It was uncovered when the shroud was "restored" in 2002, when it was dismounted from the Holland Cloth backing.
It was confirmed that the image does not exist on fibrils between the front and back face images, implying that perhaps the modality of image creation had an entrance effect and an exit effect that was vertically collimared but did not have an effect on fibrils inbetween, even when there was a gap between one fibril and the next across which one would assume a corona energy would need to arc. Very strange.
163
posted on
05/05/2010 9:28:18 AM PDT
by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: Joya
164
posted on
05/05/2010 2:31:16 PM PDT
by
Hiskid
(Jesus is Lord.)
To: Moonman62
Now why can't the Universe's greatest artist do something just as good? It doesn't have the embedded 3D terrain (topographic) map, nor is it a negative image.
You seem to have almost no knowledge of the Shroud. You're entitled to your ignorance, but why you think anyone would be interested in your ignorant opinion escapes me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-165 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson