Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JrsyJack
But it's the wrong correlation.

It's serious wounds and fatalities at stake—not "bites".

4 posted on 04/28/2010 5:38:44 PM PDT by Does so (ObamaCare...I pay for medical-marijuana claims by millions of Americans? 'Guess I do now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Does so

“It’s serious wounds and fatalities at stake—not “bites”.”

According to the CDC, the amount of dog bite related fatalities has not risen (accounting for the increase in both human and dog populations) since pit bulls became popular. There are also several other places that have found pit bull bans to be useless, including Denver, Colorado and the UK (whose bites have risen significantly since their ban was enacted).

Calgary does not have breed specific legislation, but instead opted for responsible dog ownership laws that effect ALL dog breeds through the education and regulation of their owners. Since their legislation was enacted, they have seen a dramatic decrease in serious attacks from all breeds, as well as having an estimated 90% licensing rate for all dogs, which is amazingly high.


7 posted on 04/28/2010 5:43:39 PM PDT by solosmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Does so
It's serious wounds and fatalities at stake—not "bites".

And if so, what does this tell you?

9 posted on 04/28/2010 5:46:06 PM PDT by kanawa (Is Eaker going swishy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson