Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler

That’s for the guy who “found” the phone. Chen’s criminal liability is more likely related to PC 496, reciving stolen property. Gizmodo has civil liability under the California Civil Code trade secrets act., CC3426.

I somehow think that some of the posters on this thread would take a different view if someone just “found” their car in the parking lot of the local Walgreens, and sold it to Gawker for five large.

But I could be wrong.


101 posted on 04/26/2010 5:29:08 PM PDT by absalom01 (Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: absalom01

LOL ... yeah when it comes to your car, then it’s a different story...


105 posted on 04/26/2010 5:44:46 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: absalom01

What you seem to have missed is that the phone was most likely planted, not lost, for publicity benefit.

Apple had a chance to reclaim the phone when the finder tried to return it, but they wouldn’t have it. They wanted the phone out there.
.


107 posted on 04/26/2010 5:48:25 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson