Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv
approximately 190,000 years ago. And that shift, the scientists propose, followed soon after people first began wearing clothing...

Which was soon followed by the opening of "gentleman's' caves" where women would be paid to dance and take the clothes back off.

34 posted on 04/23/2010 12:29:44 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker
LOL! Yes indeed, we humans are a mess of contradictions when it comes to sexuality.

Females have a prominent sexual display front and center meant to evoke the rear view, a very common sexual display tactic among primates. And human females mate out of estrus, practically unheard of among any other species. And although we pair bond and are mostly monogamous, about 10% of children are born to a father outside the pair bond (but mommy doesn't say so).

Physically we are one of the most sexual animals, but we like to cover it up with clothes, culture, and tradition.

So YES. No doubt the first thing men thought of soon after their culture embraced the use of clothes was “Where do I go to see them take those clothes OFF!”

LOL!!!

35 posted on 04/23/2010 12:40:03 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: colorado tanker

Really this study should have been of crab lice.


41 posted on 04/23/2010 6:51:00 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson