Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68

He had no authority or duty to address it in that circumstance. It would have been a violation of the law for him to say or do anything about it then no matter what he thinks.


383 posted on 04/22/2010 7:19:05 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

Oh, really? A Notary Public has a greater duty than a the Chief of the Supreme Court?


386 posted on 04/22/2010 7:21:46 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye
He had no authority or duty to address it in that circumstance. It would have been a violation of the law for him to say or do anything about it then no matter what he thinks.

Who knows? There's plenty of words written here on this forum from posters who were absolutely certain that at 12:00 noon on January 20th, 2009, the first words from the Chief Justice's mouth were going to be, "Show me the long form!"

388 posted on 04/22/2010 7:25:38 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson