Replies

I agree. I can’t see them ruling on it, but until they do (if they do, which again, I agree with you is highly unlikely) there is not a clear definition of NBC. I think the precedent was already set with Cleveland. I think that no one wants to touch the anchor baby issue, whether we have an illegal president, etc. Can you imagine, past the rioting that so many seem to pooh-pooh, the way the rest of the world would take advantage of the fact that we would have US citizens claiming that everything the “fake” president did while in office was invalid and illegal? All the orders for the military were illegal? It would be a major security crisis.
I think a lot of these people (Orly, Berg, etc.) are working for the dems, trying to rile up the far-right base so they can make fun of them. It makes more sense than accusing yourself or myself of working for the DOJ.

Can you imagine, past the rioting that so many seem to pooh-pooh, the way the rest of the world would take advantage of the fact that we would have US citizens claiming that everything the “fake” president did while in office was invalid and illegal?

In modern times, a precedent was established in 2000 of using the courtroom to fight the outcome of presidential elections. It was tried again in 2004 in Ohio. And again here we are, dealing with a group of people unhappy that the voters didn't turn out in their favor, trying once again to have an election overturned in the courtroom, calling the President of the United States an "usurper" which is no different from the "selected not elected" garbage we heard for throughout the previous administration. It'll be the same in 2012 regardless of who wins. Sarah Palin could win and there will be birthers on the left arguing she was born in Canada. The names and faces may change but the tactics will remain the same

I mean, good grief! I didn't want Obama to win! But 53% of my fellow Americans did and that's the way it is. I'll put a "Miss me yet?" bumper sticker on my car and hope the Republicans can lick their wounds and find an electable conservative to run next time. That's the way democracy works.

I think a lot of these people (Orly, Berg, etc.) are working for the dems, trying to rile up the far-right base so they can make fun of them.
Are you having fun yet?
It makes more sense than accusing yourself or myself of working for the DOJ.
What a strange comment to make.

You still present too pat of a "personality" to me. It's like the poster who conveniently shows up on an ADD/ADHD thread who has a child or sibling and a tale to tell that simultaneously, and conveniently, touts the liberal talking points.
And you appear by your writing to be far too intelligent to have lived the life you claim as yours, though I could be wrong and will apologize if I'm wrong. It's easy to paint a picture of a misspent youth.
C ya around.