Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: STD
Everyone, including the SCOTUSA, Congress and the executive branch know Zero isn’t eligable to be president by any reasonable streatch of the imagination. Only children born from the union of two US citizen’s is elgible to become our president. He could have been born in Chicago and he’s still inelgible.

My sediments exactly. Can anyone explain the left's argument against the "Natural Born Citizen" definition requiring TWO (2) U.S. Citizen parents? Has there ever been a court case that decided exactly what "Natural Born Citizen" means? Even if we accept the argument that his mother was old enough to pass her citizenship onto zero, that still leaves the messiah one U.S. Citizen short.

118 posted on 04/21/2010 10:03:06 PM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Auntie Dem
Has there ever been a court case that decided exactly what "Natural Born Citizen" means?

No - thats the problem ...

160 posted on 04/21/2010 11:00:09 PM PDT by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

To: Auntie Dem

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009_11_01_archive.html


164 posted on 04/21/2010 11:04:53 PM PDT by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson