What do you think post 160 is, what do you think that post 162 pointing out the absurdity of your promoting Romney under this pretense is?
Nothing explains why you are pushing the totally unacceptable Romney so hard and to the exclusion of everyone else, we are at the same stage of 2012, as April of 2006 was to 2008, were you already locked onto Mitt Romney or any other candidate then, or was that too early for such a thing? This early in the game, it is easier to name the people that are unacceptable under any circumstances, instead you want to shut out viable candidates like Palin and others and promote the one that should never be promoted, Mitt Romney.
Regardless of our choices as candidates start becoming known in the coming year, Mitt Romney does not belong among them.
Please leave me alone. Thank you.