[MrChips]

The trouble with all the Mitt-bashers, though, is that they don't present a CREDIBLE alternative. While Romney is out there on TV presenting himself as a viable option, no one else is. Perhaps Newt, I guess. Sarah (God bless her) won't ever get elected nationally. Jindal is weak. The Huckster does not seem interested. Pawlenty is too soft-spoken. "W" killed off Jeb's chances. Good men like Pence and Daniels are total unknowns to the country at large. So, who? Can Christie lose a little weight by '12?

[bcsco]

You’ve provided YOUR logic for there not being ‘credible’ alternatives. Credible to you, that is. I disagree. And I will state categorically that I will never, ever, support another RINO, whether it’s Romney, Giuliani, Huckabee, Newt, or whoever. Period. Paragraph. And you can insert the RINO name [here]. I still won’t support them.

[ansel12]

Romney is the one that is not credible, with almost 18 years in the candidate game, Mitt Romney has one election win to show for it.

Romney took that one election win and did so poorly that he could not run for reelection, although he wanted to, and he left office with 34% approval and turned the seat over to the Democrats.

Romney invested about 150 million dollars in his poor showing in 2008 against unfunded, opponents with tiny organizations.

[gogeo]

Sarah (God bless her) won't ever get elected nationally...

That is, of course, what they used to say about Governor Reagan.

Flawed premises combined with flawless logic lead to flawed conclusions.