Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Knitebane

I guess you weren’t around to see tons and tons of scopes mounted on carrying handles in the 1970s, or scopes mounted on home-made flattops which only required cutting off the carrying handle, which is not integral to the receiver but simply a cast on appendage.

The point being, an ARs upper receiver is inherently stiff and ready for very accurate iron or glass sights.

For an AK or a FAL, you have to do some pretty serious aftermarket purchases and work to put on a solid optic. It’s just inherent in the design of the rifles with dust covers.


142 posted on 04/19/2010 7:29:58 PM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee
For an AK or a FAL, you have to do some pretty serious aftermarket purchases and work to put on a solid optic. It’s just inherent in the design of the rifles with dust covers.

I think I spent about $50 a few years ago for my dust cover and installed it in about 20 minutes. I've broken optics and charging handles but I've never had a problem with the dust cover. (Sadly the TAPCO piece in the second article is no longer available.)

Not having an AK I can't speak to what kind of work it takes to make one of those accept a dust cover, but for the FAL it "just works."

148 posted on 04/19/2010 7:48:01 PM PDT by Knitebane (Happily Microsoft free since 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson