Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWCmember

“... it was an issue of the southern states attempting to exert their sovereignty as states against increasing federal encroachment.”

I am always amused by this argument.

This position attempts to sanitize and cloak this fact: that southern states maintained owning another human being was not a violation of the rights set forth in the U.S. Constitution.


16 posted on 04/15/2010 1:34:13 PM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SatinDoll

Excuse me, but aren’t you the one sanitizing history? Ownership of slaves was not illegal under the US Constitution at the time of the Civil War.


22 posted on 04/15/2010 1:43:35 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

“... it was an issue of the southern states attempting to exert their sovereignty as states against increasing federal encroachment.”

I am always amused by this argument.

I too am amused. The follow on question is: Over what issue were the “southern states attempting to exert their sovereignty as states against increasing federal encroachment?” Slavery!


33 posted on 04/15/2010 1:58:11 PM PDT by TheDon ("Citizen" of Kalifornia, USSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Then why did some of the framers/founders own slaves?

Bassett, Blair, Blount, Butler, Carroll, Jenifer, Jefferson, Mason, Charles Pinckney, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, Rutledge, Spaight, and Washington. Madison also owned slaves, as did Franklin,


81 posted on 04/15/2010 4:52:34 PM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson