I'm waiting for the day when evolutionists explain away altruism. They can't because it defies the “survival of the fittest” nonsense. Every now and then, altruism makes the headlines with animals. Today, many animals have more compassion for fellow animals than human beings.
Human beings have become worse than animals when it comes to caring or allowing their young to live and thrive.
I'll never forget the story when a mother cat, methoicallt removed ALL her kitten from a burning house. I believe her name was Scarlett. She nearly died doing it. Or when a cat, raises baby mice as her own. OTOH humans abuse adopted kids or even their own. It's becoming more and more common in the news to read this.
We now insult animals when we compare how humans care for their young and animals care for their young - whether it is their own flesh and blood or adopting another animal without a mother, into their family. These people are sick that promote evolution and all the lies that surround it.
Actually, altruism is recognized by evolutionists as an important survival strategy among families an communal groups. “Survival of the fittest” doesn’t pertain only to individuals, but also to social groups and their group behavior.
Regarding sexual selection, in European culture blonds, with slender wrists and full hips are regarded as particularly sexy. Woman with these characteristics are more likely to be able to bear young successfully. Prior to knowledge of Vitamin D, these were natural signs of the fair woman who could absorb the vitamin better, the wrists indicated a lack of rickets, and the hips were better for bearing live young.