Posted on 04/14/2010 3:59:28 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
They enacted an academic blacklist of anyone raising skepticism to their findings.
It was a criminal cabal.
Bill Clinton was just being sloppy when he gave Monica Lewinsky that pearl necklace.
Same excuse posited on behalf of Sandy Burglar.
Is that what your wife said when she caught you in her bed with your boyfriend?
... guess not, huh?
Sorry climategate zealots, there is NOTHING you can say or do to make me believe in your hoax. Not before you got busted lying, not while you got busted lying, or after you got busted lying, nothing.
All that you have succeeded in is getting me to believe that scientists are government propagandists and nothing more.
Congratulations! Smashing success for science!
um ..yeah
The government officials are just trying to avoid being lynched. People in England have had to pay for Climategate
programs and policies already and they should be made as h*ll!
They hid data. They destroyed data. They intimidated other scientists, and tried to get still others fired from their jobs. They kept work that disagreed from theirs from being published in peer review magazines (so that they could dismiss it as having never been subjected to peer review).
They openly attacked anyone who proposed any alternative theories, openly derided anyone who suggested that variations in solar output might have something to do with variations in planetary temperatures even though we know quite definitely that they do.
Liars with an agenda. The problem for us is that the agenda is so important that they will pretend like none of this ever happened. If they can’t use global warming as a pretext they’ll use something else. Centralized control of the entire world economy, and legalized (obligatory no less) trading in empty assets which is what carbon trading is, a legally enforced shakedown larger than the largest shakedown anyone has ever previously imagined... with that much riding on it they’ll invent whatever science they have to. Wave enough grant money around and someone will swear to it.
Totally agree. Even though I am not a scientist, I can recall scientific method from school, as well as the validity of experiments. If I am not mistaken, which I may be, because it’s been a long time, if an experiment cannot be replicated achieving the same results using the same methods, then it is not valid.
Well, it wasn’t a “lie lie”.
And it’s not really “cheating cheating.”
Therefore, it’s all good, Now move on, nothing to see here.
The fix is in.
Sure, why didn’t they come up with this excuse months ago? DUH, my dog ate my paper. DUH, we’re sloppy. DUH, we lied through our teeth. How bought, really bad science.
No, they were not merely “sloppy” data cooks! They were very deliberate, anal-retentive, smarter-than-thou psychopaths that did the dishes after each step of their cooking process to make sure they were “clean” and in order.
They have shown that the self-proclaimed circle jerk of the educated-elite are not to be trusted and it is appearing to be the den of liars, frauds and weak-minded followers.
Criminals. Absolute thievery. Destroyers of the respect true science deserves.
Bottom line is they’re still wrong.
Well, AlGore, the “science” is settled all right! It’s officially been declared to be based on disorganized “scientists” who are poor with figures and naive to boot! In my book, I would call such folks “bad scientists” and the “science” they produce “bad science”.
That’s right, it’s official that anthropogenic global warming is bad “science” produced by bad “scientists” Good thing the Apollo moon mission wasn’t done like that. If so, why hell, we would have been blowing up our poor astronauts right and left, and probably taking out a few random Florida retirement communities in the bargain.
I wonder if AlGore still thinks that bad “science” justifies trillions of dollars of economic upheaval? Probably.
Congress was sloppy when creating HC reform. This should eliminate any discussion of Cap and Trade.
Pray for Amrica
Exactly!
That is a description of science work that 1) should not be believed and 2) should never see the light of day in any journal, peer-reviewed or not.
What a damning analysis, even if it wasn’t meant to be.
Depends on if you’re playing the back nine, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.