Skip to comments.
Turning planetary theory upside down
ESO ^
| Apr 13, 2010
| Unknown
Posted on 04/13/2010 4:03:30 AM PDT by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
What's up, doc?
1
posted on
04/13/2010 4:03:30 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv; KevinDavis
2
posted on
04/13/2010 4:04:19 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
My personal theory is that there are a lot of free roaming planetary bodies in space that we don’t know about and they occasionally get captured as they pass a star.
3
posted on
04/13/2010 4:31:14 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: decimon
I don’t know why it should be a surprise that some planets orbit their stars in the opposite direction.
To me, it’s rather silly to extrapolate all solar system observations to the entire universe, when there is a total of n=1 systems being observed. A workable hypothesis really cannot be developed on a basis of n=1.
4
posted on
04/13/2010 5:20:07 AM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: exDemMom
they’re south of the galactic equator? LOL
5
posted on
04/13/2010 5:28:52 AM PDT
by
rstrahan
To: cripplecreek
Then there are the gas giants with rocky cores ~ like Jupiter. Presumably if they get too close to a young star the hydrogen and other light gases will boil off into space leaving behind only the rocky core, like Earth.
Notice that all the rocky planets (full size ones anyway) are close to the Sun in this system, while the gas giants (and even a myriad of baby size bodies of frozen gas) are way out there.
6
posted on
04/13/2010 5:30:10 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
("Git Out The Way")
To: decimon
Which reminds me of a question: If you add up all the angular momentum of all the planets around the sun and that of the sun itself, that's a huge amount of energy. Where did it come from?
And why is it all in the same direction? It seems things falling into the sun's gravitational well would randomize in their contribution of potential energy to angular momentum. Instead, it all adds up in the same direction...
7
posted on
04/13/2010 5:47:29 AM PDT
by
Huebolt
(Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
To: decimon
Will any be transiting our solar system anytime soon?
8
posted on
04/13/2010 5:56:24 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Karl Marx was NOT one of America's Founding Fathers)
To: Huebolt
What I recall from physics is that the angle of the dangle...
9
posted on
04/13/2010 5:58:34 AM PDT
by
decimon
To: Huebolt
Instead, it all adds up in the same direction... Kinda like it was designed....
10
posted on
04/13/2010 6:04:19 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Now I see, it's obvious! It's the coriolis force due to the rotation of the GALAXY! The same as water spinning down the drain due to the earth's rotation.
Now...why does the galaxy spin? Rotation of the Universe? Why does the Universe spin. Never mind.
11
posted on
04/13/2010 6:17:31 AM PDT
by
Huebolt
(Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
To: Huebolt
It would be interesting to be able to calculate exactly how fast we are moving in relation to an absolutely inert point.
ie--the rotation of the planet, combined with our orbit around the Sun, combined with the Solar System's orbit in the Milky Way, combined with the Milky Way's movement in the Universe.....
12
posted on
04/13/2010 6:22:02 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
the rotation of the planet, combined with our orbit around the Sun, combined with the Solar System's orbit in the Milky Way
It's obvious too, that it will all add up to...2012 - right?
Seriously tho', it is only spin, or rotation, that keeps us all from being at the bottom of a gravity well somewhere, be it solar, galactic, or whatever.
13
posted on
04/13/2010 8:33:39 AM PDT
by
Huebolt
(Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
To: Huebolt
An previous acquaintance once asked why we don't all go flying off into space due to the rotation of the Earth.
I just shook my head...
14
posted on
04/13/2010 8:37:31 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
That would be SOME spin. Maybe a two-minute day?
15
posted on
04/13/2010 9:27:43 AM PDT
by
Huebolt
(Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
To: Huebolt
yeah—the concept of gravity just didn’t enter his head.
16
posted on
04/13/2010 9:38:05 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
According to
this approximately 1,342,000 mi/hr - relative to the Universe, which could be moving as well, but so far no one has found a way to measure that.
17
posted on
04/13/2010 10:27:16 AM PDT
by
PeaceBeWithYou
(De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
To: ShadowAce
That was a good Red Green bit: Red has built a huge kluge invention and says to his nephew,
"You want to have a look at this and see if there's anything I didn't take into account?"
The nephew sneers and replies, "You mean like GRAVITY?"
18
posted on
04/13/2010 10:44:01 AM PDT
by
Huebolt
(Some people are born to be slaves. They register as democrats.)
To: decimon; 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
Thanks decimon!
When these new results were combined with earlier observations of transiting exoplanets astronomers were surprised to find that six out of a larger sample of 27 were found to be orbiting in the opposite direction to the rotation of their host star -- the exact reverse of what is seen in our own solar system.
I guess no one there got the memo that the KBOs found so far have been on wacky orbits, suggesting they were hurled out by interaction(s) with other bodies -- and for that matter, that most of the planet Jupiter's 60+ known moons orbit in retrograde, a status often considered diagnostic of capture. The so-far unknown outer planets of our own system will be found to be moving in retrograde.
19
posted on
04/14/2010 4:20:58 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: decimon; KevinDavis; annie laurie; garbageseeker; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; ...
Thanks decimon! A two-list ping!
20
posted on
04/14/2010 4:21:28 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson