Once again you re-state and miss-characterize what was said so you have something you can answer.
The flying fish was and is a gliding fish. It never became a perfectly winged animal capable of powered flight such as a bird as Darwin speculated using his model.
You took it out of context to make it look like something it was not, a prediction rather than as a hypothetical example.
Typical of the deceitful quote mining creationists regularly engage in.
One might suspect that they know an honest account would doom their argument.
Perhaps that is one of the reasons why the more educated a person is the less likely they are to be a creationist.