FWIW, I’m going to predict that this fossil is going to just be another dead end, like all the rest before it.
Why?
Because man didn’t evolve from any animal so there is no connection between man and any bipedal creature. No such creature ever existed and therefore no such fossil will ever be found.
And yes, it is based on the outlook that God created man from the dust of the earth in a separate act of creation. You can not like my reason all you want, but get back to me when they find that fossil that proves the link.
Going with the ‘they are all deformed humans or deformed apes’ tactic?
Or do you actually accept that these were a species complete unto themselves that lived in Africa many years ago?
I was made from the dust of the Earth also. Was I not? Was I not also made via cellular processes involving DNA? Was I any less “made from the dust of the Earth” than Adam? Why is it OK for the “from the dust” to have an underlying physical process that science can know and understand in one instance but not the other?
“I'm going to have to share this controversial theory with you: Apes evolved from humans! Just one proof, human children are very good at climbing on n things like outdoor toys and trees. And when a babies hand is touched it automatically grips like an apes.
Recent studies suggest the possibility that some children may not have come down from the trees and became fully adapted to tree life for protection from dangers on the ground.
The ancestral memory lingers on in children as they attempt to build tree “houses and forts”.
Dr. Itup, who joined the research team recently, added,
“Dodetic compounds found along the misalignments of lumbar sonomic inclusion ratios prove it beyond all question!”.