But science is irrelevant to any theology not tied to physical dogma. That is why science is discussed, argued, and accepted worldwide by people of all faiths.
Because science, unlike faith, can be determined by evidence.
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things unseen.
And without faith, it is impossible to please HIM, for those that come to him must believe that he is, and a rewarder of those who seek HIM.
The people who choose to believe God over the speculations of man, no matter what they're based on, do not deserve the pejorative of *cretard* or *cretin* or whatever derogatory label you choose to attach to those who choose a different path than you.
You base your acceptance of the ToE on what you can see and touch which is certainly your right. But basing your acceptance of the TOE based on the evidence you see is not of faith and to add something that is not of faith to Scripture cannot, by your own reasoning, be pleasing to God.
Others of us base our acceptance of the creation account based on our conviction of God's truthfulness and reliability, accepting what He said in matters where we haven't seen Him work based on His faithfulness in our lives in areas where we have seen Him work.
FWIW, the main area of disagreement concerning the ToE between evos and creationists is the amount of change that occurs. Creationists do NOT disagree with natural selection and variation within species. That can be clearly seen. The major area is the amount of change that's capable of happening. Simply because one doesn't believe that enough change can happen to cause speciation, does not mean one is stupid or ignorant or uneducated. It means that someone has a different philosophical basis for their interpretation of the evidence. And that basis is based on interpretation of Scripture.
Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean that it's not valid, because your basis is that of "methodological naturalism", which is simply your choice. "Methodological naturalism" is strictly a philosophy and as such cannot be supported scientifically, as science is incapable of addressing that which cannot be observed of tested. So your choice to go with that has no more valid a basis than anyone who chooses to accept what God had written in Scripture as He wrote it.
Evos as a whole like to present themselves as intellectually superior and better educated that those who disagree with them (present company included, amd) but that cannot be demonstrated by adherence to a certain philosophy. One's philosophical position is not a litmus test or indicator of intelligence.
If faith is so important to you, then why do you go to such lengths to mock the intelligence of those who disagree with you? You're all worried about how creationists make Christians and conservatives look because of how they choose to exercise their faith in God (which evos portray as being *stupid*), and yet it seems to completely escape your notice how your mockery and derision of those who disagree with you make evolutionists look.
At worst, creationists will be portrayed as stupid (really only because they're portrayed that way by evos such as yourself). Your behavior and that of other evos, makes them come across as mean-spirited, spiteful, and condescending, which doesn't even need to be portrayed by anyone else as anyone can see that behavior for what it is.
To convince others that creationists are stupid requires attacks and convincing, as one's intellectual capabilities are not immediately apparent based on their belief in creation. To convince others that evos are mean spirited and spiteful just requires that others see their behavior. It speaks for itself.