Starlight denoting an old star from one hundred million light years distant would be denoting a position where no star had ever been within the ‘actual’ six thousand years that you will accept as the age of the universe.
Based on how his theory works, I don't believe that's true.
Why don't we find recent mammalian mega fauna fossilized to the same extent? Why, in other words, to dinosaur bones invariably look OLDER and more fossilized than those bones of more modern mammalian mega fauna?
Why the disparity, how do you explain why every dinosaur bone looks like it was mineralized for so much longer than, say, an elephants bones?
You don't seem to grasp what a “theory” means. Biblical apologetics as to how a god could lie and make starlight from objects that never even existed within the last six thousand years is not a theory, it is apologetics.
Do you know the difference between a scientific theory and Biblical apologetics?