What is puzzling is that the hoard seems to be the repository of someone else’s collection or that the field was the site of an earlier dumping ground that had received the refuse of other centuries. I have been reading about this and to accuse a Frenc peasant boy of 17 of counterfeiting authentic looking stone age heiroglyphics is absurd. How would he know? Unless he was in cahoots with the scholarly neighbor there seems no way he would be able to replicate these things. Another thing of interest was that it is possible that carbon 14 testing is not always as reliable as the experts wish us to think. If he was leaked out that this method is not always accurate, then it would cause an uproar amidst the establishment scientific community.
The site Glozel was a disgrace to French archaeology for around 50 years. The academics created a vicious circle of rivalry and accused the amateur finder and the amateur archaeologist for fraud and delayed the topic. Now technical analysis has proven that the artefacts are real. At the same time they have new finds of the same kind from at least five other sites in Middle France.
The site Glozel was a disgrace to French archaeology for around 50 years. The academics created a vicious circle of rivalry and accused the amateur finder and the amateur archaeologist for fraud and delayed the topic. Now technical analysis has proven that the artefacts are real. At the same time they have new finds of the same kind from at least five other sites in Middle France... more...
http://freepages.history.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~catshaman/0earlyhis/0script.htm
you mean they would have us throw out data that does not fi their theory? That’s absurd! They would never do such a thing!