This lack of blood is the single, strongest proof that Vincent Foster did NOT put the gun into his own mouth and pulls the trigger. Had he done so, the blowback from the gunshot would have coated the gun, hand, and white sleeve of Foster's shirt with a spray of blood and organic matter. None appears in the photo anywhere.
The FBI lab report reveals that even with the most sensitive chemical test available, no blood was found on the gun that Foster (we are told) inserted into his mouth and fired. Not only that, Foster's fingerprints were not on the gun.
Alamo-Girl.com still has up the Downside Legacy which lists the Clinton body count.
I don’t remember all the particulars of the Foster case but how did they not find his prints on the gun what is clearly, from the photo up thread, in his hand?
Or are you saying they did not find his prints on the gun in areas he would have had to touch in order to fire the weapon?
That there was no organic material on the gun would make the Gov’s scenario of the crime scene virtually impossible.