Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Who IS this guy? He's a total fabrication!
1 posted on 03/03/2010 10:49:08 PM PST by capacommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: capacommie
The Barack I Knew
32 posted on 03/03/2010 11:10:27 PM PST by smokingfrog (You can't ignore your boss and expect to keep your job... WWW.filipthishouse2010.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

It must be just past the full moon for the month.


36 posted on 03/03/2010 11:13:30 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

Hey capacommie, you ran a similar thread on Feb. 22:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2456767/posts

I will say once again, your evidence lacks scientific scrutiny. Don’t make allegations you can’t back up with facts. It only makes us and the Free Republic look like a group of wing nuts.


56 posted on 03/03/2010 11:31:53 PM PST by jonrick46 (We're being water boarded with the sewage of Fascism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
I do not know what the source of the photo is but it looks phony. The BO body is all wrong for a seated position. It looks like a standing position photo somebody inserted . The right arm is at an impossible angle. The face photo was shot with a different lens than the surrounding people. Notice how flat the other faces are. This means they were shot with a long lens from a long distance. Typical for a large group shot. BO's face shows depth in the features - meaning shorter lens at closer distance.

The BO head and body also show depth. Not seen in the other people. This makes the BO head look large in comparision with the other folks. My guess is differnet lens and camera location.

66 posted on 03/03/2010 11:39:00 PM PST by Upstate NY Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
Be wary of this sort of claim. These allegations feed into the “Wingnut” descriptions of eligibility questioners. The allegations were not by Apuzzo but by someone posting on the Apuzzo cite. Associating a careful and legitimate lawsuit with unsupported allegations has clearly been part of the Obama/Alinsky playbook. Perhaps a moderator would have been wise to block “Medical”, the source of the claim. No one said Obots were not clever propagandists.

Whether or not Obama was at Harvard, Columbia, Occidental, or who paid his bills is irrelevant. He was born to a non-citizen father and is thus ineligible. He can be senator, or hold virtually any office but the presidency. It is a sound protection of our liberties from someone about whose allegiances we don't know enough. All of his relatives were conveniently unavailable when he ran, his grandmother dying within days of the election. We need to focus on the one clear fact, clear because he told us, that his father was a British subject, and so was he.

Apuzzo is challenging congress and the VP for not performing their duty under the equal protection amendment. He and Donofrio have educated all of us about the incontrovertible fact of Obama’s alien father and how our founders explicitly forbade someone, whose parents were not both citizens, from becoming president. It didn't’ mean they couldn't run; Calero wasn't even a citizen, and McCain was born out of the country in Colon Panama. The mechanisms for validation were lacking, and the legislators who were asked to check, who checked thoroughly on McCain's eligibility and said, in effect, we think he should be eligible, but knew they hadn't the authority, failed to check on Obama.

70 posted on 03/03/2010 11:40:05 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

BO is listed on the Harvard alumni website as a 1991 graduate of HLS. Details by Freep Mail.


93 posted on 03/03/2010 11:57:59 PM PST by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

Phantom of the Obama


114 posted on 03/04/2010 12:16:13 AM PST by Global2010 (Strange We Can Believe In)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
And I suppose he is really one of the lizard people from Alpha Centauri wrapped in a human skin?

Get real.

He is a lousy President and a friend of radical leftists, including a domestic terrorist. But what purpose is there to seriously consider fantastic conspiracies about him?

117 posted on 03/04/2010 12:23:44 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
there is one honest reporter who would tackle this?..not one main stream media?.....

many people don't believe in the Bilderberges, the Illluminati, etc....they don't believe that a small cabal of elites run the world....

but how else could this evil incarnate not be questioned at all?

120 posted on 03/04/2010 12:29:33 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/cia-columbia-obama-cover-up-rev-dr-jamesd-manning/


146 posted on 03/04/2010 2:02:03 AM PST by gunnyg (Laddies, We're Behind ENEMY WITHIN Lines...and surrounded, if ya can "grok" that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
He doesnt have a current law license. Records are off limits. Does not make sense to go to all the work to get your law license and let it lapse
157 posted on 03/04/2010 2:11:12 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

There are contemporaneous accounts of him being at Harvard.


173 posted on 03/04/2010 3:13:21 AM PST by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

YOU again with your hyper-conspiracies? Stop using Free Republic for your delusions.


179 posted on 03/04/2010 4:47:35 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
what's always troubled me about this photo is, someone else in the photo must have their own copy of it. They would\should know if OBama was in it or not.
Yet no other copy of this photo has come to light.
181 posted on 03/04/2010 5:05:27 AM PST by stylin19a (Never buy a putter until you you first get a chance to throw it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
"This copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding."

It is certainly evidence of birth, however the fact that the subject is corporeal and breathing should be even more persuasive.

182 posted on 03/04/2010 5:05:36 AM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie; Fred Nerks

Capacommie, here are links and a post from another thread:

“If you read ‘Dreams’ you will find that Stanley Ann Dunham is quoted as telling zero (nothing ever comes out of his own mouth) that she was in Chicago working as an au pair when she ‘was only sixteen then’ - elsewhere, it states she was accepted to attend the University of Chicago, where her Uncle (Charles T Payne) was Deputy Director of the Library, so IF the date of birth on HER SS Application of November 1942 is correct, we may be able assume the year this refers to is 1958, right?

“I have seen no evidence she graduated from Mercer Island, the two teachers who rave about her in a video, carefully obscure the date of the year book they are holding, and at no time show an image of Stanley Ann Dunham in that same year book...one would think they would, if her photo was in that yearbook, wouldn’t one?

“Instead, all we are shown are images of sections of pages from what MAY be a yearbook, but the year nor the school are not identified.

“The years 1958 through to 1962 are in fact a murky blur that passes by with nothing more than third-hand hearsay stories, and ONLY ONE person who maintains he ever saw Stanley Ann Dunham and Obama Sr together in Hawaii.

“The question still remains unanswered: WHERE WAS STANLEY ANN IN THE PERIOD BETWEEN GRADUATION AND WHEN SHE SHOWED UP IN HAWAII WITH A TWO OR THREE YEAR OLD CHILD?

“p.s. If, as my research shows, Stanley Ann Dunham did not set foot on Hawaiian soil, neither the Kenyan or FMD are contenders for fatherhood.

“Question: WHY does everyone assume that ANN OBAMA in Hawaii and ANNA OBAMA in Seattle are the same person as Stanley Ann Dunham, when ‘Dreams’ makes it quite clear that a number of people in the story are COMPOSITES?”

“36 posted on Monday, March 01, 2010 8:03:56 PM by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)”

Found at Post #36:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2461337/posts?page=36#36

Link to Thread:

The REAL scoop on Obama’s background (IMHO & referenced vanity)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2461337/posts


192 posted on 03/04/2010 6:31:24 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie
Fruit of the poisonous tree
193 posted on 03/04/2010 6:35:53 AM PST by DAVEY CROCKETT (1 John 2:22...the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

A while back Lazamataz suggested you find a new hobby, like crack smoking.

Consider it.

Seriously.


198 posted on 03/04/2010 8:09:38 AM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 4mer Liberal

Ping


201 posted on 03/04/2010 8:54:46 AM PST by T Minus Four (Christians follow Christ, not other Christians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: capacommie

bump


202 posted on 03/04/2010 9:50:17 AM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson