I’m going to see if I can borrow that issue of JAMA, although I’m not entirely sure that it hasn’t gone entirely electronic. But yeah, given the age of the KV55 dead guy at time of death, there’s no way in hell it could be Akhenaten. The profile shots Hawass uses to try to show affinity (that kinda pinheaded conehead skull of Tut, alongside the KV55 skull) reminds me of the n-rays fiasco. Hawass’ latest thing is to “identify” pharaohs’ mummies. The sad fact is, most of the pharaohs (not merely those of the New Kingdom) don’t have extant mummies, the tombs were robbed in ancient times and the remains burned (if they were dry enough) or unwrapped or cut apart to get at the precious objects in the wrappings, and the remains decayed to dust or disarticulated parts. KV55 was discovered undisturbed, one of just a few (three from the 18th Dynasty; and even Tut’s was entered by ancient robbers, just wasn’t plundered), and it was a ramshackle collection of borrowed burial items.
JAMA | Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun’s Family
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=185393
JAMA | King Tutankhamun’s Family and Demise
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=186115
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159872