[ImperialistDaddy]

Actually it is not an amendment. It is in the original Constitution. Why you think that anyone who is in line with the founding fathers is a Libertarian pro-abort, pro-legalization of drugs is beyond me?

[parsifal]

Experience. I have found that many discontented conservatives are really more libertarian than conservative, and that the stuff we ain’t going far enough on for their liking, is like all economic libertarian stuff that has been snuck in on the GOP and conservative by LICE (Libertarians Infiltrating Conservative Entities)

parsy, who assumes sometimes

[An.American.Expatriate]

Actually it is not an amendment. It is in the original Constitution.

Oh, you are one of THOSE conservatives that only thinks that the ORIGINAL constitution is valid...

I guess the following was not a part of the original constitution either:

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.