Skip to comments.
Easy Math Problem
http://www.angelfire.com/ak2/intelligencerreport/math.html ^
Posted on 02/08/2010 4:29:26 PM PST by navysealdad
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Son-Joshua
Would love to know the reasoning behind 144..
21
posted on
02/08/2010 4:38:34 PM PST
by
Onerom99
(I)
To: Onerom99
22
posted on
02/08/2010 4:38:45 PM PST
by
caper gal 1
(Prayers for Rush.)
To: navysealdad
This problem must be getting easier because in the e-mail I got it in the minimum I.Q. was 140. hehe
23
posted on
02/08/2010 4:38:51 PM PST
by
My hearts in London - Everett
(So the writer who breeds more words than he needs, is making a chore for the reader who reads.)
To: muir_redwoods
Freepers are just smarter than the average........
24
posted on
02/08/2010 4:39:22 PM PST
by
navysealdad
(http://drdavehouseoffun.com/)
To: navysealdad
It took me two seconds flat... because I could see the answer on post 3.
25
posted on
02/08/2010 4:39:27 PM PST
by
irishtenor
(Beer. God's way of making sure the Irish don't take over the world.)
To: navysealdad
26
posted on
02/08/2010 4:39:31 PM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: caper gal 1
27
posted on
02/08/2010 4:39:36 PM PST
by
Onerom99
(I)
To: Onerom99
Took me about 12 seconds.
How did you get that? Did I miss something, or was 12 sec. to quick?
28
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:19 PM PST
by
John D
To: gthog61
Smart enough to tutor my stepdaugther. Phone numba pls.
29
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:28 PM PST
by
Diggity
To: navysealdad
Is this the White House Math?
30
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:30 PM PST
by
tallyhoe
To: caper gal 1
Oops.. i did mean 144 then.. lol.. I pushed a wrong number on my calculator..
My bad.. Duh.
31
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:35 PM PST
by
Onerom99
(I)
To: navysealdad
IQ is only a measure of how good you are at taking IQ tests.
32
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:40 PM PST
by
Fresh Wind
("...a whip of political correctness strangles their voice"-Vaclav Klaus on GW skeptics)
To: navysealdad
120 isn’t all that great, is it?
Anyway, the problem is not difficult.
33
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:44 PM PST
by
Rocky
(Obama's policy: A thousand points of lies.)
To: navysealdad
Got it.Took me 15 seconds.
To: Onerom99
Divide each of the supposed “sums” by the actual sums of the two digits, then divide that number by the first digit in order to solve the final equation.
35
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:53 PM PST
by
caper gal 1
(Prayers for Rush.)
To: navysealdad
You know what they say, “Fools multiply rapidly.”
36
posted on
02/08/2010 4:40:56 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: John D
My bad.. I mis-hit a # on my desktop calc..
37
posted on
02/08/2010 4:41:02 PM PST
by
Onerom99
(I)
To: Onerom99
I hate it when that happens! But that is a good shade of red on you . . . : )
38
posted on
02/08/2010 4:42:39 PM PST
by
caper gal 1
(Prayers for Rush.)
To: navysealdad
Too easy.
144
Took about 10 seconds to see the relationship between each set.
39
posted on
02/08/2010 4:42:59 PM PST
by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: DaveTesla
40
posted on
02/08/2010 4:43:33 PM PST
by
dfwgator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson