there are several identified in the article that haven’t been addressed yet. why dont you look to those?
instead its the same tired argument.
If the danger were really as great as you would like for people to believe, it would be easy for you to do. Instead, you just spread FUD and make non-responsive answers. Anyone reading this thread can see for themselves that you have nothing but hot air to spew on this topic. We'll just have to leave it to the kind readers to make what decisons they will make, given the facts presented.